tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post2769247138088334099..comments2024-03-07T15:32:53.014+02:00Comments on Yehuda: Top Ten Smallest Integers Natural NumbersYehuda Berlingerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16038826060312027387noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-65074747915591185662007-05-15T07:49:00.000+03:002007-05-15T07:49:00.000+03:00So where was my brain today? Out in left field, I ...So where was my brain today? Out in left field, I guess.<BR/><BR/>All this "higher mathematics" is too much for me!Gerald McDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03032201828179314072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-88619162603493588652007-05-14T09:29:00.000+03:002007-05-14T09:29:00.000+03:00I love my readers.YehudaI love my readers.<BR/><BR/>YehudaYehuda Berlingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16038826060312027387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-64658749481172605552007-05-14T01:04:00.000+03:002007-05-14T01:04:00.000+03:00So, Top 10 Smallest Positive Integers then?So, Top 10 Smallest <B>Positive</B> Integers then?Duncan Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280914228859902589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-62942520153860374702007-05-14T00:53:00.000+03:002007-05-14T00:53:00.000+03:00Aww crud, I meant "whole number" not "natural numb...Aww crud, I meant "whole number" not "natural number" - unless you use the older definition for "natural number" - e.g. N*. "Positive integers" will do...meowsqueakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10559964541118532157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-20858526988490284962007-05-14T00:48:00.000+03:002007-05-14T00:48:00.000+03:00Shouldn't that really be the "Top Ten Smallest Nat...Shouldn't that really be the "Top Ten Smallest Natural Numbers"? Integers include 0 and -1, -2, etc. Note that for any integer N, -N is 'smaller'.<BR/><BR/>-- meowpedantmeowsqueakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10559964541118532157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-9805001612037785872007-05-13T20:10:00.000+03:002007-05-13T20:10:00.000+03:00Gerald,I'm sure you're thinking about "numerals", ...Gerald,<BR/><BR/>I'm sure you're thinking about "numerals", not "integers".<BR/><BR/>YehudaYehuda Berlingerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16038826060312027387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9319479.post-44747674836060328362007-05-13T19:56:00.000+03:002007-05-13T19:56:00.000+03:0010 is not an integer, but 0 is.10 is not an integer, but 0 is.Gerald McDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03032201828179314072noreply@blogger.com